VAED-Home
 
 
Court Locations
CM/ECF
 
Court Schedules
 
Courtroom Technology
 
Forms and Fees
 
Local Rules
CJA Attorneys
 
Notable Cases
 
Opinions
 
 
Links
 
VAED-Home

Court Electronic Records


United States v. Jay Lentz
Criminal No. 01-150-A

Below are selected documents filed in U.S. v. Jay Lentz.
Click on the docket number to read the document.

Filing Date Docket Number Docket Text
09/15/2004 384 Copy of Opinion of USCA, decided 09/14/2004, re: [377-1] appeal by USA (04-8), [378-1] appeal by Steven D. Mellin (04-7), [322-1] appeal by USA (03-15); Affirmed in part, reversed in part, the District Court decision and remanded by published opinion.
01/29/2004 375 Amended memorandum opinion as to Jay E. Lentz. (Signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee)
07/22/2003 337
AMENDED OPINION as to Jay E. Lentz that deft's Rule 29 Motion is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED that this Order be STAYED for seven days until 7/29/03 to allow for a pretrial services investigation and consideration of bond pending appeal; and it is further ORDERED that pre-trial services commence an investigation into whether there is a combination of conditions that will; 1) ensure Jay Lentz's appearance before the Court for further proceedings and 2) ensure safety of the community and it is further ORDERED that pre-trial services present its report to the Court not later than 7/28/03; the parties are further ADVISED that the Court will hold a hearing to determine whether to release Jay Lentz on bond on 7/29/03 at 10:00 a.m. (See Order for Details.) (Signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies Mailed: yes
02/07/2003 256 Copy of Fourth Circuit OPINION as to Jay E. Lentz, decided 2/6/03, affirming the district court's orders re: [239-1] appeal (ctat) [Entry date 02/10/03]
09/03/2002 230 Superseding NOTICE as to Jay E. Lentz by USA of Intent to Seek the Death Penalty (ctat) [Entry date 09/03/02]
07/24/2002 164 SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT as to Jay E. Lentz (1) count(s) 1s, 2s, 3s (ctat) [Entry date 07/25/02]
05/14/2002 143 ORDER as to Jay E. Lentz for reasons stated, [115-1] motion by USA in limine to Admit Out-of-Court Statements Made by Doris Lentz is granted in part and denied in part; [108-1] motion by USA in limine to Admit Evidence of Uncharged Wrongdoing by the Defendant is granted in part and denied in part and [88-1] motion by USA in limine to Admit Out-of-Court Statements made by Doris Lentz as Non-Hearsay or as an Exception to the Hearsay Rule is granted in part and denied in part. (See Order for full detail) ( Signed by Judge Gerald B. Lee ) Copies hand delivered: y (jsol) [Entry date 05/14/02]